Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Beverley Nolan's avatar

100% on board with this, Patty! For me, part of the problem arises when we get stuck in the teacher/student paradigm that draws on our early learning experiences. By this I mean, a teacher is going to tell/show me how to do something and as a student I will watch/listen and mimic the teacher. Then, of course? I can judge and be judged on whether I am doing it right/well or not.

This leads to breaking down skills and knowledge into parts, which is undeniably of huge value, but we may get stuck there as both the teacher and the student, and never progress into critically thinking about moving, which happens, for me, when the ‘teaching’ paradigm becomes one of facilitator/participant

So, yes, let’s understand the biomechanics if we want to but let’s use it as a way into the vast territory of the body systems and explore!

Expand full comment
Abigail Rose Clarke's avatar

this is just so lovely. And it is interesting to think of the way 'alignment' already points us to straight lines. I love the way you've given a framework for what movement can look like - which would include stillness and pause. If we think of tadasana as a template for stillness within movement- a stillpoint that movement arises from and returns to - then it feels to me like it becomes much more alive. And the word "stack" certainly doesn't bring a sense of aliveness to my body and mind.

Because I've had the very immense pleasure of studying with you for so long, I know this came from you, but I don't know when it was exactly - but for years I've referred to this style of alignment as "relational alignment" rather than "positional alignment" - positional alignment focuses on the position of the parts - put this here, place that there, etc- and is externally oriented. In positional alignment, we NEED the teacher, or perhaps a mirror, to tell us if we're doing it "right". And there is some benefit to this, to be sure - I don't want to say that we never need some external input on movement, because living in a body it can be difficult to notice our habitual patterns, along with just the nature of learning something which is we don't know what we don't know. But relational alignment means we are orienting ourselves to the relationship we have with the earth. If I am giving my focus to the relational alignment my body has with gravity, then I immediately move from a focus on stacking and positioning my body in certain ways to a felt sense of space and flow. And then the teacher occupies a different role as well - rather than telling me if I am "doing it right" or moving my body into various adjustments - definitely a cause of some of these injuries you're mentioning- now the teacher is in the role of midwifing an experience by offering new pathways to imagining and orienting ourselves to the space within the body, or by placing a single light touch at one point in the body, as I've seen you do countless times and have myself done so often, and yet it never loses its magic.

I'll leave it here for now, but I am so grateful you put this out on the internet where lots of people can find it, and I hope they do!

Expand full comment
20 more comments...

No posts